Challenge
The challenge is to introduce a preventive system that will in some way influence legal entities to fulfill their legal obligations, so that in addition to the offense they are charged with and for which they are guilty, liability for damage is a preventive punishment that will contribute to the overall good in society and respect for regulations by all participants in legal transactions, which is why these types of cases are an exceptional challenge.
The idea for the procedure itself was initially aimed at determining the responsibility of the contractor, who in this particular case is legally obliged to undertake regulated activities and seek appropriate approvals before commencing the work, precisely because of the fact of preventing harmful consequences for the participants in the work and for third parties.
First of all, we concluded that the contractor had taken out liability insurance with one of the insurance companies. However, we decided that the claim should be against the informant, and not against the insurance company, due to certain exceptions and not
After providing the evidence and expert opinions in a short period of time, the lawsuit was filed with the Basic Civil Court in the Court. With the lawsuit, we requested that the injured party be compensated for the material damage.
The first-instance procedure ended positively in favor of the injured party, with a realistic amount of compensation for damages. After the defendant filed an appeal, the Court of Appeal rejected it and confirmed the first-instance verdict.
